In 1857, as Labuan was adjusting herself to being the only British colony in Borneo—Sarawak was not a “colony” in the official meaning of the word—the Indians at India rose to fight against the rule of the British East India Company (EIC), which functioned as a sovereign power on behalf of the British Crown. It was later famously (or infamously, if one was pro-colonialism) known as The Sepoy Rebellion. At its peak the company—an English, and later British joint-stock company— was the largest corporation in the world and had an army that was twice the size of the British army at the time.
Closer to home, North Borneo found herself officially ruled by the British when the London-registered British North Borneo Provisional Association Limited was founded in 1881, and a year later, the company was granted a Royal Charter. Old Sabah was destined to become the last country in the world to be ruled by a chartered company.
When I posted a picture of Sultan Muhammad Jamalul Alam, Sultan Sulu, who sold Sabah to Baron Gustavus von Overbeck dan Alfred Dent in 1878 last month, many commented and argued that the Sultan had no ownership, control or dominion over old Sabah, and so, how could he sign us away?
I think a more interesting and pertinent, and ultimately significant question was why were van Overbeck and Alfred Dent perfectly happy to sign the treaty concession with the little, backward and improvised Sultan of Sulu? In truth, they could have signed it with someone else if they had found a “ruler” of some note in mainland Sabah, or at least those areas (East Coast) where Brunei’s control were weakest. That was the European colonist’s play book—one that maybe called “Empire by Treaty.”
That was how EIC gained and controlled large swathes of old India. From the middle of the eighteenth century the British in India used many treaties (many signed under the gun) with South Asian rulers to give legal form and sanction to their growing military and territorial power. EIC were willing to sign treaties with every Taneesh, Dhishan and Hari (“Tom, Dick and Harry”) regional and provincial rulers, big or small, where they found them, for they knew, and they planned that they would take over completely.
And so was what that happened in Sabah. Whether “pajak” means rent or complete sale, the Sulus were never going to get back what they think (or claim) as theirs.
Picture:
A painting by Edward Armitage depicting the Battle of Miani, 1843. (Miani, today is in Pakistan).
Suggested reading:
A British Empire by Treaty in Eighteenth-Century India by Robert Travers, in Empire by Treaty: Negotiating European Expansion, 1600-1900 (Saliha Belmessous (ed.)). Published: 27 November 2014.